Author Who Knew ‘How To Murder Your Husband’ Killer Digs Into Case In New Podcast
This is an excerpt from our true crime newsletter, Suspicious Circumstances. Sign up here.
When the news broke in June 2018 that a beloved chef had been fatally shot at the Oregon Culinary Institute where he taught, local romance novelist Heidi Joy Tretheway didnât pay much attention.
âIt may have been a blip on my radar,â she told HuffPost about the death of Dan Brophy, 63, âbut I wasnât focused on the news at that time.â
That all changed three months later, when Brophyâs wife, Nancy â who had once written an essay titled âHow To Murder Your Husbandâ â was arrested and charged with his murder.
Advertisement
âMy husband was watching the news, and he paused it and he called me into the living room,â Tretheway said about that September day. âHeâs like, âThis was a romance writer. Did you know this person?â And Iâm like, âYes, I actually did,ââ Tretheway said.
In fact, when Tretheway was a member of Rose City Romance Writers, the Portland chapter of Romance Writers of America, Nancy Crampton Brophy, now 74, was its president.
âYou canât imagine that you could potentially know of a murderer,â Tretheway said. âIt wasnât even in my realm of possibility that Nancy could have done this violent crime.â
Advertisement
That said, she wasnât exactly fond of Crampton Brophy, especially how she delivered feedback.
âShe tore up one of my book covers and said it was all wrongâ during one of the clubâs meetings, she said.
But Tretheway followed Crampton Brophyâs advice.
âI made those changes and that became my most commercially successful book. So Iâm not mad about it,â she said.
In the eyes of podcast network Wondery, the womenâs connection made Tretheway â a marketing professional who now has eight romance novels under her belt â a perfect candidate to host âHappily Never After: Dan and Nancy,â its new true crime podcast with The Oregonian/OregonLive.
In the snappy new six-part podcast, we hear from detectives who cracked the case, prosecutors and Crampton Brophy herself â directly from her testimony at her trial but also through lurid passages from her own romantic suspense novels, read by a rapturous voice actor. Many are drawn from Crampton Brophyâs âWrong Never Felt So Rightâ series, which includes âThe Wrong Husband.â
Advertisement
In real life, Dan Brophy seemed to be Nancyâs Mr. Right. The couple had been married more than 25 years, and seemed very much in love. Detectives believed her shock and grief when they told her about his death. When her essay â which described motives and methods for murder â came to light, Crampton Brophy said it was humorous satire.
Still, one line resonated with investigators:
âBut the thing I know about murder is that every one of us have it in him/her when pushed far enough,â she wrote.
Dan Brophyâs body was found by his students in one of the culinary schoolâs kitchens, where heâd been filling buckets of water and ice on the morning of June 2, 2018. He had been shot twice, once in the back and once in the chest, at close range.
It wasnât long though before investigators uncovered a possible motive. The Brophys had been struggling financially and Nancy, who had worked as an insurance agent, was the sole beneficiary on her husbandâs numerous life insurance policies â policies, authorities said in court documents, she had sold to herself. When combined with Dan Brophyâs workerâs compensation benefits, she stood to gain almost $1.5 million from his death.
Advertisement
Authorities believed that Crampton Brophy altered a gun she owned with a replacement âslide and barrelâ she had purchased on eBay â components that when switched out with the original gun frame would produce different markings than the bullets recovered from the crime scene. (Those parts were never recovered.)
Crampton Brophy originally told the police that she had been home in bed the morning her husband was killed. When investigators located surveillance footage showing her van driving near the culinary institute at the time of his death, she attributed her conflicting account to the âretrograde amnesiaâ she suffered after learning that her husband had been killed.
Despite knowing Crampton Brophy and following the case, Tretheway said she was surprised by the investigationâs âplot twists,â which she learned about while recording episodes of the podcast.
âThis story is constantly twisting and turning on different pieces of the investigation,â she said. âYou kind of know the ending, right? You know who died, right? You know âwhodunnit.ââ
âHow they did it, why they did it â I was constantly surprised by that.â
She also praised prosecutorsâ âtactical and strategic movesâ during the trial, especially when Crampton Brophy elected to testify.
Advertisement
âJust the fact that they realized Nancy is the main character in her own mind, that she was going to want to tell the story and kind of like step forward into the limelight on the stand.â
âI think ultimately what was most convincing for a jury was to see Nancy try to spin a story that excused all of these very strange circumstantial things that pointed to her guilt, and she was never able to adequately explain them.â
The podcast presented an interesting conflict for Tretheway.
âIâm writing romance and then Iâm talking about the destruction of a relationship,â she said. âYikes.â
Tretheway loves the romance genre.
âI really embrace it because itâs part of the human condition. And whatâs more important than love? People fight â and die â for this.â
Advertisement
Comments are closed.