Feds Set To Cut Coronavirus Testing Funds As COVID-19 Cases Soar
COVID-19 testing centers across five states are set to lose federal funding next week after the Trump administration decided not to extend the program that established them.
As a result, 13 testing sites across Colorado (1), Illinois (2), New Jersey (2), Pennsylvania (1) and Texas (7) will likely close if those states are unable to replace the necessary funding.
In a statement to HuffPost, Assistant Secretary for Health Brett Giroir confirmed that the program that originally funded 41 such sites across 48 states would end next week.
Giroir said it’s part of a planned transition to “more efficient and effective testing sites,” noting that the original end date had already been postponed once.
“All 13 sites were provided an extra 30 days from the original transition date in May,” Giroir said, “and I personally spoke with Governors from all 5 states involved, and/or their leadership designees, who agreed that it was the appropriate time to transition out of the original 13 sites and into the thousands of new testing options.”
In a follow-up call with the media Wednesday afternoon, Giroir emphasized that the fate of these sites ― constituting a small portion of overall testing capacity nationwide ― will be up to the states, who can administer them or close them as they see fit.
“The federal government just sent out 11 billion dollars to the states and tribes in order to support their state and local testing plans,” he said. “There is no reason that a locally unresponsive, bulky, parallel system needs to occur when the states could happily take these over.”
The decision is nevertheless receiving scrutiny as new coronavirus infections soar across the country. More than half of all states are now seeing an increase in cases and more than a dozen states recently saw a record number of infections ― including Texas, home to seven of the testing sites set to lose funding.
“It’s pretty clear to me, and I think it’s clear to all of us, that with the uptick of cases, now is not a time to retreat from our vigilance in testing,” Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said in a statement, distancing himself from the decision.
While U.S. testing capacity has steadily increased since states began implementing stay-at-home orders in March, it badly lags a number of other countries on the measure of tests administered per infection found. That’s an important metric for deciding whether it’s safe to relax social distancing restrictions, according to Johns Hopkins University.
“The rate of positivity is an important indicator because it can provide insights into whether a community is conducting enough testing to find cases,” Johns Hopkins explains on its website. “If a community’s positivity is high, it suggests that that community may largely be testing the sickest patients and possibly missing milder or asymptomatic cases.”
As of June 22, one out of every 12 tests administered in the U.S. came back positive, according to data tracked by the University of Oxford-based Our World in Data. In South Korea, long a world leader in testing, 93 tests were administered for every positive case. And in New Zealand, which has effectively eliminated the coronavirus, the ratio is 300 to 1.
Despite the continued and persistent testing shortfall, President Donald Trump this week repeatedly called for a slowdown in COVID-19 testing, because the surge in new cases they help reveal is making his administration’s response look bad.
“Cases are going up in the U.S. because we are testing far more than any other country, and ever expanding,” he tweeted on Tuesday. “With smaller testing we would show fewer cases!”
The White House claimed that Trump was “joking” and his comments were made “in jest.” But when asked if he was in fact joking when he made such remarks, he told a CBS reporter, “I don’t kid.”
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up for membership to become a founding member and help shape HuffPost’s next chapter